By the co-author of The easy Guide to Your Walt Disney World Visit 2020, the best-reviewed Disney World guidebook series ever.

Available on Amazon here.

(As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.)

Review: Under the Sea ~ Journey of the Little Mermaid

By Dave Shute


The signature ride of Disney World’s Fantasyland expansion, Under the Sea ~ The Journey of the Little Mermaid, formally opened in early December 2012.

Located in Prince Eric’s castle, and duplicating the already opened version in Disney California Adventure, this new attraction is both wildly popular (so far) and quite a disappointment.


Under the Sea ~ The Journey of the Little Mermaid faithfully re-tells the story of the Little Mermaid through a sequence of colorful, fun, and well-done scenes.

Under the SeaYour ride begins in a clamshell, and the clamshell moves through the various scenes, rotating to direct attention.

You begin above the sea, have the story introduced, go under the sea for the next part of the story, and finish back on dry land.

Journey of the Little MermaidVisuals range from a massive (and somewhat dull) undersea party scene to a charming silhouette of Ariel and Eric.

All the visuals are adequate, some more than that, but nothing in the ride’s conception or execution will astonish viewers who aren’t deeply invested in the movie already.

That is, young folks who love the movie will love this ride.

For anyone else it’s a bit of a yawn.

Eric Ariel and the MoonLike Dumbo and Prince Charming Regal Carrousel, the pleasure for most will not be in the ride itself, but rather in watching the delight of those to whom the ride speaks clearly.

Now “astonishment” is a pretty high standard, and not much else in Fantasyland (or even all of Disney World) meets it. In Fantasyland, only Mickey’s Philharmagic and Enchanted Tales with Belle (another element in the Fantasyland Expansion) are astonishingly good to most; Peter Pan is astonishing to many, but not to all.

But for the signature ride in the first major expansion of Fantasyland in 40 years, “astonishing” is the right standard to use.  And the new Under the Sea ~ The Journey of the Little Mermaid doesn’t even come close.

It’s not an “E” ticket ride; it’s not even a “D” ticket. It is, frankly, a “C” ticket, which means it’s also a lost opportunity. For the funds and fanfare devoted to Under the Sea ~ The Journey of the Little Mermaid, it could–and should–have been much better.

See it with about the same priority you’d put on it’s a small world: worth it, but not worth planning your day around it.

Follow on Facebook!



1 Carrie { 06.12.14 at 10:22 am }

We took our children to Disneyworld in 2013 when they were 4.5 yrs and 2.5 yrs. While you might not think this is a great ride, my young children thought it was the best ride in the entire park. Our 1st day we used a FP (old system) to ride this and the lines were too long to ride it again – they were so disappointed. So on our 2nd day at MK, we went to this ride first thing and they rode it over and over again until the line got long. They loved it! For young kids and especially young princess fans, this is a great ride! So while this might not be a good ride for your target audience or older kids, its a nice ride for the preschoolers.

2 Melanie B. { 11.18.15 at 7:24 am }

I agree with your verdict of a “C” ticket. Just rode for the first time a few weeks ago and was glad we only waited about 15 minutes for this skippable ride. The beautiful new queue for Peter Pan’s Flight was more impressive and delightful than this uninspired trek. Thanks for your review!

3 Dave { 11.18.15 at 9:41 am }

You bet, Melanie!!

Leave a Comment | Ask a Question | Note a Problem

My response to questions and comments will be on the same page as the original comment, likely within 24-36 hours . . . I reserve the right to edit and delete comments as I choose . . . All rights reserved. Copyright 2008-2024 . . . Unless otherwise noted, all photos are by me--even the ones in focus--except for half a dozen from my niecelets . . . This site is entirely unofficial and not authorized by any organizations written about in it . . . All references to Disney and other copyrighted characters, trademarks, marks, etc., are made solely for editorial purposes. The author makes no commercial claim to their use . . . Nobody's perfect, so follow any advice here at your own risk.