3 responses

  1. Jane
    June 19, 2019

    Hi Dave, I’ve been reading a lot of comments around the net where people are angry that Club level guests are getting all the good FP b/c they can book 90 days out. But everything I read from January 2018 when they started the program says that those FP don’t take away from the 60 day pool of FP. Do you know if they stuck with the original idea of not taking away from the 60 day availability? I can’t find any updated info. Just curious, as many people think this is why they don’t get SDD or FOP etc. Thanks!

    Reply

    • Dave
      June 20, 2019

      Jane, people think the darndest things. The reason people can’t get FP+ at 60 is because other people have longer ticket lengths. So if you have a ten day ticket, at the 60 day mark you can book the full ten days. If you have a four day ticket, you can book four days. So folks with longer tix snatch up FP+ for days that folk with 4 day tickets can’t even book…

      To answer your specific question, whatever the pool is, there are not enough club rooms to have a material impact…

      Reply

  2. Anonymous
    January 14, 2018

    I see this as being the same problem we have with people booking campsites to get fast passes, then cancel the res. and keep all the fast passes for the week. Disney has to get organized and connect this, so that the fast passes are cancelled when the res. is cancelled. There are always people who work the system.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

My response to questions and comments will be on the same page as the original comment, likely within 24-36 hours . . . I reserve the right to edit and delete comments as I choose . . . All rights reserved. Copyright 2008-2021 . . . Unless otherwise noted, all photos are by me--even the ones in focus--except for half a dozen from my niecelets . . . This site is entirely unofficial and not authorized by any organizations written about in it . . . All references to Disney and other copyrighted characters, trademarks, marks, etc., are made solely for editorial purposes. The author makes no commercial claim to their use . . . Nobody's perfect, so follow any advice here at your own risk.

Back to top
mobile desktop